Live Help
Your Session Will Expire in   seconds.
If you do not wish to log-out, choose 'Let me continue'
Reset SessionCancel Session
 

Self-trades not meant to create artificial volume, it had arisen due to technicalities of trading system: SAT

March 17, 2017[2017] 79 taxmann.com 201 (SEBI)
115 Views

SEBI: Where it was alleged that Noticee Nos. 1 & 2 had entered into repetitive self-trades in violation of provisions of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c) & (d) and 4(1), 4(2) (a) & (g) of PFUTP Regulations through Noticee No. 3 broker, however, there was no evidence to suggest that Noticee Nos. 1 & 2 had colluded with any other entity or promoters in creation of artificial volume and or in making any false corporate. Therefore, it could not be suggested that self-trades were executed to create an artificial volume. These self-trades had arisen due to technicalities of anonymous online trading system. Thus violations against Noticee Nos. 1 and 2 were not established, hence, there was no case to draw any adverse inference on Noticee 3 either that it had failed to adhere to the Code of Conduct as prescribed under Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock Broker and Sub broker) Regulations, 1992

read more

taxmann.com
Payment
Best view in 1140 x 768